Once a player installs everything they need and want, they can enjoy San Fierro in GTA 5. It is northwest of the original GTA 5 map, so players can still go back to the old map if they wish to.

GTA V will take place in the city of Los Santos and its surrounding areas. San Fierro and Las Venturas, parodies of San Francisco and Las Vegas which appeared firstly in GTA: San Andreas, will not feature in the game.

All areas in IV map are renamed, not even a single one is left out, I guarantee it. In San Andreas, Mount Chiliad lies in west of LS, while in V, it lies at North. Blaine County is introduced to V, which is absent in SA. Many of the areas are renamed too.

The original game’s map encompassed three cities—Liberty City (based on New York City), San Andreas (based on San Francisco), and Vice City (based on Miami)—but later titles tend to focus on a single setting; usually one of the original three locales, albeit remodelled and significantly expanded.

That post suggests that GTA 6 is codenamed Project Americas and will be set in Vice city and a new city based on Rio de Janeiro. It’s rumoured to be set between 1970 and 1980 and the main character is mixed up with the drug trade. The game may feature drug empire mechanics inspired by Vice City.

Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas takes place in 1992 within the fictional US state of San Andreas – based upon sections of California and Nevada as seen in the early 1990s – which consists of three main cities: Los Santos (based on Los Angeles), San Fierro (based on San Francisco), and Las Venturas (based on Las Vegas).

Yes. All the games have good stories, but if you want to play one for the story, i would suggest gta iv or san andreas. Gta v story mode isn’t bad, and you can do a lot of minigames if you’re bored with the missions. Overall, i would say yes, just play them through and have fun.