1)How does the peacekeeping and order maintenance role frequently manifest itself? By discouraging crime, deviance, causing peace frequently. It can lead to lower rates by the cleanliness of the community causing less disorder and less desire for crime.

If someone calls the police about another person as a way of diverting attention away from his or her own behavior, this is termed. Counterpunching.

relieving an unpleasant situation. Traffic enforcement activity is perhaps the most common type of order maintenance activity carried out by the police.

According to the text, patrol officers exercise the greatest amount of discretion. Discretion increases as one moves down the policing organizational hierarchy.

Every person, no matter how minor their offense might be, would get arrested and taken to court to face charges without this presence of this principle. That means police discretion does an excellent job of streamlining our criminal justice system when it is correctly applied.

The exercise of police discretion is a decision-making process, as officers evaluate the situations in which they intervene and choose a course of action from among a set of alternatives; if their involvement is not at the request of a citizen, they also make decisions about whether to intervene.

In the context of policing, discretion means that officers are given some leeway on which they can rely as they make choices that impact the people they are policing. It is also not advisable for officers to do so. This means they must decide whether the person breaking the law is posing some threat to public safety.

On the other hand, the use of police discretion has been criticized for negative aspects. To begin, there is the risk that the police officer might misinterpret a statute when performing his duties. For instance, the officer could misinterpret a statute and make an erroneous arrest.

Studies in this literature generally hypothesize that discretion plays one of two roles: either it serves as the means by which changing broad social norms against crime cause changes in sentencing patterns (with concurrent changes in formal laws reflecting broad social norms but not causing criminal justice outcomes).

Discretion is defined as the right of someone to make choices or the quality of someone who is careful about what they do or say. An example of discretion is the ability of a juror to determine a verdict. All the decisions were left to our discretion.

As elsewhere in life, discretion is important in the criminal justice system. Discretion is also important in that it allows judges to take certain policy imperatives into consideration. In some cases, for example, it may be necessary for the courts to show leniency because the prisons are overcrowded.

Discretion is defined as the power or right to decide or act according to one’s own judgment. Officers must use discretion when deciding to enforce the law when certain situations arise.

2 : the quality of having or showing discernment or good judgment : the quality of being discreet : circumspection especially : cautious reserve in speech. 3 : ability to make responsible decisions.

Discretion is the power or right to make official decisions using reason and judgment to choose from among acceptable alternatives. Only the Constitution, through judicial enforcement, can limit discretionary decision making by legislative bodies to pass laws. …

Judicial discretion refers to a judge’s power to make a decision based on his or her individualized evaluation, guided by the principles of law. Judicial discretion gives courts immense power which is exercised when legislature allows for it.

What are the two major areas of judicial discretion?…

• Correctional officers & supervisors (jails & prisons, institutional corrections)
• Probation & parole officers (community corrections)
• Treatment professionals (educators, counselors, psychologists, & others)

In a functional sense, discretion is often used by both legislators and judges to achieve fairness in procedure as well as in outcome. It enables judges, who are best placed to consider the particular facts of any given case, to identify what fairness may require in the circumstances.

Judicial Discretion Definition Its judicious use increases fairness and can help to promote an equitable legal process by allowing the judge to consider individual circumstances in instances when the law is insufficient or silent.

One of the most important aspects of life is ‘decision making’, and for every choices involves making the right decision. Every choice that we had decided on doing can impact our lives either in a good or in a bad way, it helps shapes us to identify who we are to ourselves and to other people.

Discretion exists when the decision maker has the power to make a choice about whether to act or not act, to approve or not approve, or to approve with conditions. The role of the decision maker is to make a judgement taking into account all relevant information. Powers to act and to exercise discretion.

Discretion has the meaning of acting on one’s own authority and judgment. In law, discretion as to legal rulings, such as whether evidence is excluded at a trial, may be exercised by a judge. Those in a position of power are most often able to exercise discretion as to how they will apply or exercise that power.

Discretion and Independent Judgment

In public administration, administrative discretion refers to the flexible exercising of judgment and decision making allowed to public administrators. For example, a public official has administrative discretion when he or she has the freedom to make a choice among potential courses of action.

Use of discretion becomes necessary, especially in situations in which imme- diate action is needed. For the most part, frontline or street-level bureaucrats work in situations where discretion is required because the rules and laws are too complicated and may not be adequate in specific cases.

There are three main heads under which the control over administrative discretion exercised.

• Parliamentary Control over administrative discretion.
• Judicial Control over administrative discretion.
• Procedural and Executive Control.

Judicial control mechanism of administrative discretion is exercised at two stages: (1) Control at the stage of delegation of discretion; (2) Control at the stage of the exercise of discretion. (1) Control at the stage of delegation of discretion.

The abuse of administrative discretion takes a number of forms for instance, acting on mala fide grounds, ignoring relevant considerations and acting on irrelevant ones, making decisions without cogent material and misconstruing the power granted by law.

abuse of discretion. n. a polite way of saying a trial judge has made such a bad mistake (“clearly against reason and evidence” or against established law) during a trial or on ruling on a motion that a person did not get a fair trial.

 ‘Discretion’ when qualified by the word ‘administrative’ refers to. choosing from amongst the various available alternatives but with reference to the rules of reason and justice and not according to personal whims. Such exercise is not to be arbitrary, vague and fanciful, but legal and regular.