'I don't think it would have saved it': Avatar: The Last Airbender Co-Creator Not a Big Fan of Show's Most Controversial Episode Which They Say is 'Filler-y'

'I don't think it would have saved it': Avatar: The Last Airbender Co-Creator Not a Big Fan of Show's Most Controversial Episode Which They Say is 'Filler-y'

HomeNews, Other Content'I don't think it would have saved it': Avatar: The Last Airbender Co-Creator Not a Big Fan of Show's Most Controversial Episode Which They Say is 'Filler-y'

Avatar: The Last Airbender's every episode isn't the masterpiece fans want it to be.

Bryan Konietzko teases the future of Avatar Studios | Exclusive Interview with ATLA Co-Creator | Avatar

Avatar: The Last Airbender has always been considered a masterpiece. For those who have made it, Michael Dante DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko, a lot went into the process. The critical thinking, analytical understanding and connection between the fans and their characters set the foundation for their show to make it the magnum opus it now stands as.

Anyone who makes art, when they look at it over and over again, flaws tend to show up even when there aren't any. Michaelangelo discovered that he destroyed his own sculpture as the Pietà now sits in pieces. There can be many different reasons why the many artists who will hate their own works. But for DiMartino and Konietzko, one particular episode is like a thorn in their side.

During an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Michael Dante DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko got candid about the episodes they found problematic and the ones they hold close to their hearts. Avatar: The Last Airbender is a near perfect show, close to being the key word. The series has its ups and downs, especially with some episodes that fans find filler.

Tagged:
'I don't think it would have saved it': Avatar: The Last Airbender Co-Creator Not a Big Fan of Show's Most Controversial Episode Which They Say is 'Filler-y'.
Want to go more in-depth? Ask a question to learn more about the event.