Numerous organisational and individual factors impact implementation and uptake, including clinician behaviour, lack of time, difficulties in developing evidence‐based or informed guidelines, a lack of continuing education and an unsupportive organisational culture (Haynes & Haines 1998, Wallis 2012), the availability …

Translation of research into clinical practice is often conceptualized as proceeding from awareness through acceptance to adoption. 8 Educational methods, such as disseminating practice guidelines and continuing medical education, clearly aim at awareness and acceptance.

Steps in promoting the uptake of research findings

1. Determine that there is an appreciable gap between research findings and practice.
2. Define the appropriate message (for example, the information to be used)
3. Decide which processes need to be altered.

Dissemination refers to the process of sharing research findings with stakeholders and wider audiences. Dissemination is essential for uptake, and uptake and use of research findings is crucial for the success and sustainability of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in the long term.

Common methods of dissemination include:

1. Publishing program or policy briefs.
2. Publishing project findings in national journals and statewide publications.
3. Presenting at national conferences and meetings of professional associations.
4. Presenting program results to local community groups and other local stakeholders.

A dissemination strategy is the intentionally-developed approach to dissemination of a particular project which includes identification of targeted potential adopters, an assessment of the climate of readiness for change, planning how engagement will be built throughout the project, and enabling transfer of project …

A dissemination plan is a plan for disseminating research findings or products to those who will use the information in practice and is something that you should be thinking about early on. It is what will help you get the message out whether it is results of research or a successful intervention.

The most important reason to disseminate research includes the facilitating of the process of research uptake in decision-making i.e. making public the findings of the research so that evidence based practice can be implement in clinical settings.

In a scientific context, dissemination is defined as making projects results available to the scientific community, policy makers and industry – using scientific language prioritizing accuracy.

Dissemination and communication

1. Plan for dissemination. Research. Planning. Selecting channels and materials.
2. Consider your target audience.
3. Select key messages.
4. Consider dissemination options.
5. Develop appropriate materials.
6. Consider other ways to improve accessibility.
7. Implement your strategy.
8. Evaluate effectiveness of dissemination.

Why is dissemination important? Creating a sound dissemination strategy for a research project will lead to increased awareness of the research and, therefore, maximize the impact that the research can have in improving the health outcomes of the patients that will benefit from it.

10 TIPS FOR IMPROVING RESEARCH VISIBILITY

1. Expand your co-authorship base.
2. Select your title and keywords wisely.
3. Make your articles open access.
4. Effective use of online social media.
5. Create and share podcasts.
6. Sharing research outputs other than the manuscript.
7. Create a personal blog.

3) Methods of information dissemination The dissemination is required to be efficiently carried out by using multiple communication tools such as direct handout, direct mail, fax, and e-mail to achieve prompt and widespread alert for safety concerns.

Dissemination efforts need to take into account the message, source, audience, and channel. Practitioners and policy makers can be more effectively reached via news media, social media, issue or policy briefs, one-on-one meetings, and workshops and seminars.

Known as the three Ps, posters, presentations, and papers, have historically been the three primary ways of dissemination and remain as the most popular methods in the nursing field (Brown & Schmidt, 2009; Dudley-Brown, 2012).

In disseminating qualitative data, researchers have an array of presentational styles and formats to choose from that best fit their research purposes, such as drama, dance, poetry, websites, video and evocative forms of writing.

Introduction

1. Description of your institution and the reason why it became involved in the project.
2. Description of the dissemination strategy used.
3. Background information on the region where the dissemination takes place.
4. What strategy did you decide to adopt for this dissemination project?

Communicating research to stakeholders: Conclusion Once you’ve identified your audience, take Amina’s advice and focus on developing long-term relationships. Do this by ‘networking as much as possible, helping others and maintaining good contact and relationships with stakeholders. ‘

Collaboration. Data sharing encourages more connection and collaboration between researchers, which can result in important new findings within the field. Sharing data also enables researchers to perform meta-analyses on the current research topic.

We define dissemination as a planned process that involves consideration of target audiences and the settings in which research findings are to be received and, where appropriate, communicating and interacting with wider policy and health service audiences in ways that will facilitate research uptake in decision-making …

Draw on key themes: Highlight the key themes your work embraces – social inclusion or community development, for example – and explore how your findings shed light on these concepts. Focus on experiences: Use interesting and important case studies or examples as a way to explore the broader findings of your research.

Reporting research findings is important for dissemination and for synthesis and evidence-based management (EBM). One is research synthesis. Structuring knowledge through synthesis uses the results of individual studies as data, and the audience is scientists.

Presenting your study is perhaps as important as conducting it, because this is how most people will be able to understand your procedures, discuss results, offer feedback, and take your work a step further.

Challenges to data sharing identified by respondents

• Organising data in a presentable and useful way (46%)
• Unsure about copyright and licensing (37%)
• Not knowing which repository to use (33%)
• Lack of time to deposit data (26%)
• Costs of sharing data (19%)

The ability to share the same data resource with multiple applications or users. It implies that the data are stored in one or more servers in the network and that there is some software locking mechanism that prevents the same set of data from being changed by two people at the same time.

You need to be careful with how much personal information you reveal online. Sharing your address, phone number, birthday and other personal information can mean you are at a greater risk of identity theft, stalking and harassment. This includes information you post on social media.

A big problem in embedded systems occurs in embedded software when an interrupt service routine and the main program share the same data. The calculation performed by the main program might be corrupted because it is based off the wrong/different data value. This is known as the shared data problem.

Examples of data sharing concerns: Data cannot be publicly shared because it contains potentially identifying information of human subjects. Data contains the locations of endangered/threatened species or valuable artifacts and will only be shared with trusted parties who will agree to reuse criteria.

Data sharing is the practice of making data used for scholarly research available to other investigators. Access to publicly archived data is a recent development in the history of science made possible by technological advances in communications and information technology.

Data sharing may take different forms, from simply publishing the results of research to publicly sharing detailed patient-level datasets. Finally, taxpayers provide a large amount of money to support publicly funded research and expect to have access to the benefits of that research.