Some typical kinds of evidence a CSI might find at a crime scene include:
Q. What happens first when forensic scientists arrive at a crime scene?
The Initial Call The first individuals at the crime scene should act as security to restrain people who do not need to be present. Contamination of evidence jeopardizes the case, so management of this scene is imperative. Further personnel are then contacted if required.
Table of Contents
- Q. What happens first when forensic scientists arrive at a crime scene?
- Q. For which of these pieces of evidence will Forensic scientists conduct an identification test?
- Q. What is an example of relevant evidence?
- Q. How do I know if evidence is relevant?
- Q. How do you prove something is relevant?
- Q. How can you make sure evidence is relevant?
- Q. What is the test of relevance in evidence?
- Q. What are the requirements for admissibility of evidence?
Q. For which of these pieces of evidence will Forensic scientists conduct an identification test?
Answer: The glove is a physical evidence that could be used by forensic scientist to perform an identification test.
- Trace evidence (gunshot residue, paint residue, broken glass, unknown chemicals, drugs)
- Impressions (fingerprints, footwear, tool marks)
- Body fluids (blood, semen, saliva, vomit)
- Hair and fibers.
Q. What is an example of relevant evidence?
Example: Ruby Ridge is charged with stealing costume makeup from a drugstore the night before Halloween. The prosecution wants to offer evidence that Ruby’s mom had refused to buy her a Halloween costume. The evidence is relevant to prove that Ruby had a motive for stealing the makeup. Example: Same case.
Q. How do I know if evidence is relevant?
Evidence is ‘relevant’ when it has applicability to the issues presented in the case. Relevancy is that quality in evidence that makes it properly applicable to the truth or falsity of matters at issue between the parties. A fact is relevant when it helps to prove an issue.
Q. How do you prove something is relevant?
Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and. (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.
Q. How can you make sure evidence is relevant?
Basically, if evidence is to be admitted at court, it must be relevant, material, and competent. To be considered relevant, it must have some reasonable tendency to help prove or disprove some fact. It need not make the fact certain, but at least it must tend to increase or decrease the likelihood of some fact.
Q. What is the test of relevance in evidence?
Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.
Q. What are the requirements for admissibility of evidence?
To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay).
