HUMAN ACT An act that is performed only by a human being and thus is proper to man. Human acts, that is, acts that are freely chosen in consequence of a judgment of conscience, can be morally evaluated. Human acts – Acts that are done with intellect, will, knowledge and consent.

Ethics focuses not only on human action but also on its morality. Once we decide that an action is human, then that action becomes subject matter for ethics. It is an important function of ethics to figure out whether particular human actions are moral or not.

Answer: Human acts are actions done intentionally, free, and deliberate of a person. A man is fully responsible with the consequences of his acts. Involves and man’s responsibility and accountability of the results of his/her actions while Acts of man are instinctive, such as physiological in nature.

Only human acts are moral acts. Acts of man, for example, can be considered human acts if the action is carried out with malice. “Human acts” are the actions that humans, do: any and every action. According to Aquinas, it can be taken as a circumstance because the end is an integral part of every moral act.

The essential elements of a human act are three: knowledge, freedom, actual choice.

Human Acts versus Act of Man • Acts of Man • Actions beyond one’s consciousness; not dependent on the intellect & the will • ESSENTIAL QUALITIES of Acts of Man – Done with out knowledge – Without consent – Involuntary • Ex: unconscious, involuntary, semi-deliberate, spontaneous actions • Acts of man can become human …

Two categories of Acts of Man Examples: blinking of the eyes. digestion. perspiration.

The three determinants of morality are the Object of the Act (Finis Operis), End of the Agent (Finis Operantis), and Circumstances B1.

The modifiers of human acts include ignorance, passions, fear, violence, and habit. Each of these can influence people’s actions negatively.

A person acting. with fear is acting freely inspite of his fear and is in full control of himself. y Acts done out of fear, however, great, is simply voluntary although it is also conditionally voluntary. It is simply voluntary because the person remains in control of his faculties, including that of moderating fear.

While every story has to end its own way, there are six general types of ending….The six types of story endings include:

• Resolved ending.
• Unresolved ending.
• Expanded ending.
• Unexpected ending.
• Ambiguous ending.
• Tied ending.

Intrinsic evil is the opasdsdsdddposite of extrinsic evil: It is an act which is naturally (intrinsically) evil, because the act itself is absolutely contrary to reason, to nature, and to God. Intrinsic evil can never be done, for it can never be good, because good can never be good and evil at the same time.

The most common examples of things that people recognize as being classified as intrinsically evil are, suicide, euthanasia, abortion, and the use of contraception.

Some actions are extrinsically evil because certain factors attached to them by way of circumstances render them opposed to the norm of morality. Example: Drinking liquor is extrinsically evil when done in excess. Human Acts- done by a person who is in control of his faculties: intellect and will.

A good intention may diminish the gravity of a sinful action, it can never turn an evil object into a good one. Similar to intentions, they can actually lessen the gravity of a sin, but no circumstances can make a wrong action good. Every intrinsically evil act will remain evil regardless of the circumstances.

Moral Consequences of Circumstances. Sometimes circumstances affect the morality of the action only in degree, that is, they increase or diminish its goodness or malice. Stealing is bad by object; stealing a rare object increases the malice of the action but it adds no additional kind of evil to the act.

What makes an act performed by a human being distinctively a human act is that it is voluntary in character, that is, an act in some way under the control or direction of the will, which is proper to man. One can therefore identify the human act with the voluntary act.

Humans have a moral sense because their biological makeup determines the presence of three necessary conditions for ethical behavior: (i) the ability to anticipate the consequences of one’s own actions; (ii) the ability to make value judgments; and (iii) the ability to choose between alternative courses of action.

Animals lack the capacity for free moral judgements All non-human animals lack the capacity for free moral judgment. Therefore, non-human animals do not have moral rights.