The aim of the Judicial Diversity Initiative (JDI) is to promote the equal participation of women and men from a diverse range of backgrounds, experiences and identities in the judiciary in England and Wales by 2020.

Bringing diverse experiences and perspectives to the bench allows judges to make better informed decisions and increases public confidence in our justice system.

The legal profession, therefore, should be inclusive of all peoples and many ideas. “Diversity matters because diversity in the legal profession promotes the public’s perception of an equal and fair judicial system.” “Diversity is critical to the legitimacy of our judicial system and the rule of law.

intermediate appellate court justices, 22 percent of the nine Court of Criminal Appeals judges, and 33 percent of the nine Supreme Court justices in Texas. Ten percent of the district court judges were Hispanic and 3 percent were African American.

Why judicial diversity matters For that reason, the judiciary is one of the professions where diversity matters the most. The lack of diversity among our judiciary deters individuals from under-represented groups from participating in the justice system, negatively affecting the administration of justice.

For the public to perceive our court system as impartial and accessible, the judiciary must reflect the diverse population affected by its decisions. Our conscious attitudes towards gender and race may not match hidden biases that steer our reasoning and behaviour as demonstrated by implicit-association test results.

While the ethnicity of judges has nothing to do with the quality of their legal reasoning, diversity is important because of the need for broader perspectives that can be brought to bear on the real-world issues facing judges in complex cases.

Research shows that judicial diversity enriches judicial decision-making, promotes public confidence in the judiciary, and establishes role models across demographic groups.

Article III of the Constitution created the U.S. Supreme Court and gave Congress the power to create the federal courts of appeals and district courts. Since 1789, more than 3,427 judges have served on Article III courts. Currently, there are 146 active African-American Article III Judges.

This is a list of African Americans who have served as United States federal judges. As of December 22, 2020, there have been 229 African-Americans to have served on the federal bench.

Justice Thurgood Marshall

27 percent

Why does the race of judges matter? This Note argues that racial diversity in the judiciary improves legal decisions about political morality. Judges play a substan- tial role in regulating our political morality; at the same time, race and ethnicity influence public views on such issues.

The civil rights movement of the 1950’s and 1960’s provided a model that other groups have used to extend civil rights and promote equal justice. The NAACP used America’s own laws from the Constitution to challenge the status quo and win victories against racist laws and policies.

Judicial Review is the power of the U.S. Supreme Court to review laws and actions from Congress and the President to determine whether they are constitutional. This is part of the checks and balances that the three branches of the federal government use in order to limit each other and ensure a balance of power.

Consultation and how to avoid Judicial Review

1. ESTABLISH THE AIM OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE AND BE CLEAR ABOUT THIS. If the aim is to reduce spend then be honest about this from the start.
2. DUTY TO CONSULT.
3. TACKLE CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES HEAD ON.
4. ENSURE RELEVANT INFORMATION IS OBTAINED AND SHARED.
5. CLEAR CRITERIA.
6. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS.
7. TIME.
8. CONSCIENTIOUS CONSIDERATION.

The salaries of the Judges of Supreme Court and High Courts is decided by the President of India according to Article 125 and Article 221 of the Constitution of India respectively.

A candidate must have a degree in law and must have practiced as Advocate, Attorney or Pleader in the high court or subordinate courts. Minimum 3 years of service after obtaining a degree in law. Minimum 3 years of service after obtaining a degree in law.

You may appear for judicial service exam to become a civil judge. Best of luck! The basic step is to get a undergraduate degree. As for now, the best choice will be to opt for humanities, with economics or mathematics in class 11th.

STEPS TO BECOME JUDGE there is no way you can become a judge without being a lawyer because you have to have some good experience and good name as a lawyer then after some 3 years + experience you may become a judge if you are smart enough for tat..

The minimum qualifying marks differ from state to state. For instance, the UP judicial examination 2021 requires a candidate to attain a minimum of 40% of the total marks (30% of the total marks for SC/ST) to qualify. Undoubtedly, judicial services exams are amongst the most difficult competitive exams in the country.