The teleological argument (from τέλος, telos, ‘end, aim, goal’; also known as physico-theological argument, argument from design, or intelligent design argument) is an argument for the existence of God or, more generally, that complex functionality in the natural world which looks designed is evidence of an intelligent …

Hume’s problem with the Design Argument is that we have never witnessed the creation of this universe or any other — just as we have never witnessed the creation of babies of the new species. This forces us to make an analogy between the Universe and Human Artifacts.

In order to legitimately judge the provenance of the universe, we need to know whether other universe-like things are created mostly by nature or mostly by design. Since we cannot do this, the Teleological Argument is invalid.

Design arguments typically consist of (1) a premise that asserts that the material universe exhibits some empirical property F; (2) a premise (or sub-argument) that asserts (or concludes) that F is persuasive evidence of intelligent design or purpose; and (3) a premise (or sub-argument) that asserts (or concludes) that …

… We can extend this entire idea cursorily to the Teleological fallacy — an idea that an object is in place to allow for the accomplishment of a certain purpose, when there are insufficient evidence for that purpose.

Design argument (teleological argument) St Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274) argued that the apparent order and complexity in the world is proof of a designer and that this designer is God. This suggests there must be a designer, which he said is God. Paley used a watch to illustrate his point.

The character Philo, a religious sceptic, voices Hume’s criticisms of the argument. He argues that the design argument is built upon a faulty analogy as, unlike with man-made objects, we have not witnessed the design of a universe, so do not know whether the universe was the result of design.

The teleological argument is an attempt to prove the existence of God that begins with the observation of the purposiveness of nature. The teleological argument moves to the conclusion that there must exist a designer.

Advantages

• The design argument uses analogies which are familiar to everyone, to make it both simple and persausive.
• It is argued that the amount of chance/good luck that would be required to put together a universe without a designer is so great that it couldn’t have happened.

DAVID HUME’S
DAVID HUME’S CRITICISMS Hume argued that there is nothing in this argument to suppose there is only one creator – there may be a team of lesser Gods who built the world.

So the first way in which teleological reasoning may be an outright fallacy, is when an arrow is drawn directly from the future to the past. In every case where a present event seems to happen for the sake of a future end, that future end must be materially represented in the past.

teleological ethics, (teleological from Greek telos, “end”; logos, “science”), theory of morality that derives duty or moral obligation from what is good or desirable as an end to be achieved. Teleological theories differ on the nature of the end that actions ought to promote.

List Of Weaknesses Of The Teleological Argument. 1. It Is Subjective The idea that the universe was intricately designed is subjective. There are many observations in the natural world that can produce different theories that will account for the existence of the universe. 2. Evolution Suggests a Designer Is Unnecessary

The teleological argument is an attempt to prove the existence of God that begins with the observation of the purposiveness of nature. The teleological argument moves to the conclusion that there must exist a designer. The inference from design to designer is why the teleological argument is also known as the design argument.

P rofessional philosophers commonly regard the Ontological Argument as the best single logical argument in favor of God’s existence. In fact, many secular philosophers have conceded that the Modal Ontological Argument (the version of the argument under consideration in this article) holds up under even the most rigorous scrutiny.

An ontological argument is a philosophical argument , made from an ontological basis, that is advanced in support of the existence of God. Such arguments tend to refer to the state of being or existing.