A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research.

The purpose of a literature review is to: Identify need for additional research (justifying your research) Identify the relationship of works in context of its contribution to the topic and to other works. Place your own research within the context of existing literature making a case for why further study is needed.

Definition. A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated.

Which statements are TRUE about literature review? Literature review should focus on a broader topic. Literature review is just the summary of current research. Literature review is a summary of your ow research.

The purpose of a literature review is to gain an understanding of the existing research and debates relevant to a particular topic or area of study, and to present that knowledge in the form of a written report. Conducting a literature review helps you build your knowledge in your field.

63). Over the years, numerous types of literature reviews have emerged, but the four main types are traditional or narrative, systematic, meta-analysis and meta-synthesis.

To determine what exists in the scholarly literature. To identify possible gap(s) in the scholarly literature for further research. To inform the research topic, theory (if applicable), and associated methodology. To compare/contrast against findings resulting from the current study.

Originally Answered: What are the different forms of literature? There are five main forms of Literature: Poetry, Prose, Drama, Non-Fiction, and Media. In ancient Greece, literature was divided into two main categories: tragedy and comedy. Nowadays the list of possible types and genres of literature can seem endless.

Qualities of A Good Lit Review A good literature review is NOT simply a list describing or summarizing several articles; a literature review is discursive prose which proceeds to a conclusion by reason or argument. A good literature review shows signs of synthesis and understanding of the topic.

Just like most academic papers, literature reviews also must contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper.

Elements of a review paper

• Title Page. On the title page include the title, your name, and the date.
• Abstract. An abstract is a brief summary of your review.
• Introduction. The introduction of your review should accomplish three things:
• Discussion. The discussion section is the body of your paper.
• Conclusions.
• References.

Below is what not to include in your literature review. Do not include purely historical or informational material, such as information from websites. The literature review is a synthesis and analysis of research on your topic in your own words. Most ideas can be and should be paraphrased.

Enough! Maybe – as a very rough and ready rule of thumb – 8-10 significant pieces (books and/or articles) for a 8,000 word dissertation, up to 20 major pieces of work for words, and so on. But use your judgement! Skim through the books and articles identified as potentially relevant.

The literature review section of an article is a summary or analysis of all the research the author read before doing his/her own research. This section may be part of the introduction or in a section called Background.

These reviews often fail to provide details of the overall research strategy, the selection and exclusion of articles, the limitations of the search method, and the quality of the search process, and they often lack details on how the analysis was conducted.

The definition of a limitation is a restriction or a defect, or the act of imposing restrictions. When you are only allowed to walk to the end of the block, this is an example of a limitation. When there are certain things you are not good at doing, these are examples of limitations.

Advantages: The articles found in many scholarly journals go through a “peer-review” process. In other words, the articles are checked by academics and other experts. The information is therefore reliable.

The most important components of a critical appraisal are an evaluation of the appropriateness of the study design for the research question and a careful assessment of the key methodological features of this design.

What is important to assess when critically appraising a literature review? A reviewer reads through a study from beginning to end, noting whether the title and abstract are clear, if relevant terms are defined, and if the introduction, methods, results, and discussion are plainly identified.

Dissecting the literature: the importance of critical appraisal

1. reduce information overload by eliminating irrelevant or weak studies.
2. identify the most relevant papers.
3. distinguish evidence from opinion, assumptions, misreporting, and belief.
4. assess the validity of the study.
5. assess the usefulness and clinical applicability of the study.
6. recognise any potential for bias.

What does critically evaluating the literature mean?

1. Consider how valid and reliable the research is.
2. What are its strengths and weaknesses?
3. Consider how applicable to your research question the research is.
4. Draw comparisons with other research findings.

To critically analyse or evaluate means to: (i) break something down into its component parts; (ii) provide your opinion on each part by asking the right type of analytical questions; and (iii) support your opinions with evidence.

Reviewing critically means thinking carefully and clearly and taking into consideration both the strengths and weaknesses in the material under review. Two skills to employ when asked to write a review: Seeking information: Scanning the literature efficiently to become well-informed on the subject.

To ‘critically evaluate’, you must provide your opinion or verdict on whether an argument, or set of research findings, is accurate. This should be done in as critical a manner as possible. Provide your opinion on the extent to which a statement or research finding is true.

Critically assess: As with “assess”, but emphasising your judgments made about arguments by others, and about what you are assessing from different. perspectives. This often means making the whole essay a reasoned argument for your overall case, based on your judgments.

Share this post

1. Identify the conclusion and the premises.
2. Put the argument in standard form.
3. Decide if the argument is deductive or non-deductive.
4. Determine whether the argument succeeds logically.
5. If the argument succeeds logically, assess whether the premises are true.

Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to write a critical essay:

1. Step 1 – Examine The Subject of The Essay.
2. Step 2 – Do Research.
3. Step 3 – Develop Your Thesis.
4. Step 4 – Decide Which Evidence to Use.
5. Step 5 – Include an Antithesis.
6. Step 6 – Write an Outline.
7. Step 7 – Write Your Essay.
8. Step 8 – Edit.

A critical essay is a kind of writing that requires its author to explore the strong and weak sides within a given subject. This type of essay retains all the formal features of a classical 5 paragraph essay and consists of an introduction, several body paragraphs, and a conclusion.

Writing a Critique

1. describe: give the reader a sense of the writer’s overall purpose and intent.
2. analyze: examine how the structure and language of the text convey its meaning.
3. interpret: state the significance or importance of each part of the text.
4. assess: make a judgment of the work’s worth or value.

Start your introduction with a hook to engage the readers, catch their attention, and make them want to continue reading your paper. Then define the author’s thesis and outline the key ideas. Finish your intro with your own thesis statement, gradually leading the readers into the discussion.