In this page you can discover 17 synonyms, antonyms, idiomatic expressions, and related words for encyclopedia, like: book of facts, dictionary, cyclopedia, reference, cyclopaedia, Encylopaedia, encyclopaedia, reference-book, book of knowledge, almanac and yearbook.

The antonym for retrieve is lose, i.e. fail to retrieve.

Definitions of cyclopedia. noun. a reference work (often in several volumes) containing articles on various topics (often arranged in alphabetical order) dealing with the entire range of human knowledge or with some particular specialty.

is that encyclopedia is a comprehensive reference work (often spanning several printed volumes) with in-depth articles (usually arranged in alphabetical order, or sometimes arranged by category) on a range of subjects, sometimes general, sometimes limited to a particular field while cyclopaedia is (archaic) the circle …

The largest online encyclopedias are general reference works, though there are also many specialized ones. Some online encyclopedia are an online edition of a print encyclopedia, whereas others are a separate enterprise entirely, such as Wikipedia.

Generally speaking, dictionaries provide linguistic information about words themselves, while encyclopedias focus more on the thing for which those words stand. Thus, while dictionary entries are inextricably fixed to the word described, encyclopedia articles can be given a different entry name.

Diderot

Encyclopedia Britannica ceased print production in 2012. But World Book lives on. The only official sales outlet is the company’s website. This year’s Berkshire annual meeting is the first time in years that the print product has been hauled out for retail purchase, a company rep said Friday.

Encyclopedias acquaint you with the broad outlines of the subject—sometimes saving you from embarrassing errors! Encyclopedias tell you where to get more high-quality information. Just use the list of resources at the end of the article to expand your research!

wikipedia.org

In addition, the main disadvantages of electronic encyclopedias include dependence on information technology, high initial cost, quality control, and citation.

Encyclopedias attempt to summarise knowledge in relatively short articles. As well as providing basic overviews of topics and answers to simple facts, encyclopedias perform the function of providing context, in other words, identifying where the topic fits in the overall scheme of knowledge.

Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in most dictionaries. Unlike the dictionary, which focuses on language and words, encyclopedia articles focus on facts to describe and explain the thing or concept behind the name.

Reading,advances your communication skills,as you read more of encyclopedia books you tend to communicate more better with,a greater amount of factual and referencial information on a subject. 4. You learn to unlearn,and relearn previous informations you thought was really.

People use encyclopedias to broaden their knowledge on subjects of interest. There are many subject-specific encyclopedias available on a variety of topics including medicine, law, pop culture, history and wildlife.

About Encyclopedias There are two types of encyclopedias — general and subject. General encyclopedias provide overviews on a wide variety of topics. Subject encyclopedias contain entries focusing on one field of study.

Saint Isidore of Seville

the Yongle Encyclopedia

Encyclopædia Britannica

Encyclopaedia Britannica: After 244 years in print, only digital copies sold. Encyclopaedia Britannica cost $1400 for a full 32-volume print edition.

Though a lack of relevance renders most complete encyclopedia set values at less than $75, there are some rare editions that have historical value. Older sets of encyclopedias can carry excellent value as well, especially if they’re in good condition.

If you’re looking for a more purposeful use for your old encyclopedias, try local schools and libraries. Schools can use the encyclopedias in classrooms or in their library, and local libraries sometimes use donated books to stock shelves.

Wikipedia scored highest on all criteria except readability, and the authors concluded that Wikipedia is as good as or better than Britannica and a standard textbook.

So is Wikipedia a credible source? Many of the entries are well-documented, checked for quality and — as opposed to reference books — often completely up-to-date, but, 20 years after its creation, the online encyclopedia is not 100% reliable, because information can be manipulated, and sometimes almost undetectably.

The articles in Britannica are written by authors both identifiable and credible. Many articles provide references to books and other sources about the topic covered. Undergraduates are rarely permitted to cite encyclopedia articles.

But is the website on the brink of bankruptcy? The answer is no. Run by non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia’s balancesheet looks quite healthy. In fact, its donations have increased many folds in the last seventeen years.

Unfortunately, popularity does not give you money, advertisements do. While you must have scrolled excellently through the page, few notice that Wikipedia does not show advertisements. The site is a non-profit and it’s mission, as per its founders, is to ensure that everyone can share and access free information.

“We ask you, humbly: don’t scroll away,” the message, now pinned atop every Wiki page, reads. “We depend on donations from exceptional readers, but fewer than 2% give. According to SimilarWeb, Wikipedia.org has 5.2 billion visits in July 2020 and was the eight most popular site in the world.

Wikipedia gets most of its money through donations, but also sells goods on the Wikipedia store. Of all the tools that the Internet has given us, perhaps the most useful is free-content Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia. Wikipedia is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, and is funded primarily by reader donations.