civil disobedience

Answer: b) to protest government policies they believed were unjust. Explanation: The movement aims to make the government realize the unjustness of the laws.

Which of the following statements are true of both Thoreau’s and Martin Luther King, Jr.’s attitudes toward imprisonment? Both thought that they had committed a moral and necessary act of defiance. Both reflected that they lost their inner freedom while imprisoned. Both expressed outrage at their imprisonment.

Civil Disobedience is the refusal to obey government demands or commands and nonresistance to consequent arrest and punishment. The act of civil disobedience is often a symbolic violation of the law, which is used especially as a nonviolent and collective means of forcing government concessions.

Martin Luther King, Jr., the most renowned advocate of civil disobedience, argued that civil disobedience is not lawlessness but instead a higher form of lawfulness, designed to bring positive or man-made law into conformity with higher law—natural or divine law.

The Cons of Civil Disobedience

• It can result in jail time. Many people who act in civil disobedience break laws in order to protest something.
• It doesn’t always create change. Sometimes civil disobedience simply creates a tougher resistance to the issues at hand.
• It takes time.

History and types of Civil Disobedience

• Sabotage of trade and business activity. Actions include disrupting trade, boycotts of products and deliberate damaging of goods.
• Labour resistance.
• Breaking unfair laws.

Courts have distinguished between two types of civil disobedience: “Indirect civil disobedience involves violating a law which is not, itself, the object of protest, whereas direct civil disobedience involves protesting the existence of a particular law by breaking that law.” During the Vietnam War, courts typically …

Civil disobedience, also called passive resistance, the refusal to obey the demands or commands of a government or occupying power, without resorting to violence or active measures of opposition; its usual purpose is to force concessions from the government or occupying power.

The Civil Disobedience Movement was not successful. But it prepared the people of India for great sacrifice. Unlike the Non-cooperation Movement, the Civil Disobedience Movement increased the popularity of the Congress.

Many types of objections to civil disobedience have been raised, often based on the view that citizens in a democracy are obliged to obey the law. However, none of these objections are decisive against every act of civil justification. Thus, civil disobedience may be morally justified, even in a democracy.

Some people may think that civil disobedience is a thing of the past, a kind of action limited to historical figures such as Mahatma Gandhi, Rosa Parks, or Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. This is not true; Acts of civil disobedience are happening presently all around the world.

Civil disobedience is an important part of a democratic country because it is one of the driving factors that allow individuals to exercise their rights to free speech and speak up against an unfair and unjust government and its laws.

Civil Disobedience is a valuable human trait because it exposes unjust government systems. Disobedience allows us to see how and when the government is being unjust because it prompts us to listen to our consciences.

Now it is included among God’s precepts that one should obey his superiors. And so the disobedience by which one disobeys his superior’s commands is likewise a mortal sin, in the sense that it is contrary to love of God—this according to Romans 13:2 (“He who resists those powers resists God’s ordination”).

“Disobedience… is man’s original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion.”

Non-violent civil disobedience is effective because it emphasizes a group’s proposed injustice within an institution, while directly appealing to the different ethical systems of individual citizens.

I agree with the thought that disobedience is a valuable trait and promotes social progress in the sense that when laws and customs are found to be unjust, it is in their will and right to not bide by such customs. Thus such disobedience would stimulate change and awareness to the harsh realities of such laws.

Non-violent disobedience is perfectly legal. It opposes only a particular law but respects the legal system. Therefore, the non-violent form of disobedience to law does not disrespect law; but respects legal order. It is not ordained so much against the law as such, as it is against the letter of the law.

Disobedience can have a variety of causes. At times, it is due to unreasonable parental expectations. Or it might be related to the child’s temperament, or to school problems, family stress, or conflicts between his parents.

As verbs the difference between disrespect and disobey is that disrespect is to show a lack of respect to someone or something while disobey is to refuse to obey an order of (somebody).

Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. “Whoever curses his father or his mother shall be put to death.”

8 Strategies for Dealing with a Defiant Child

1. Hold your child accountable.
2. Choose your battles.
3. Act, don’t react.
4. Enforce age-appropriate consequences.
5. Keep your power.
6. No second chances or bargaining.
7. Always build on the positive.
8. Set regular times to talk to your child.

Willful disobedience means intentionally or willfully disobeying a lawful order, directive, statute, regulation, policy, procedure, etc.

1) Don’t treat talking back as disrespectful of authority because the reverse is actually true. Disrespect is shown by ignoring and dismissing what parents say, treating it as not worth attending to. By talking back, however, the teenager affirms and engages with their authority by taking it on.