There is currently an excessive amount of waste and plastic pollution in our waterways, rivers and oceans. Therefore, it is the collective responsibility of every human to clean the environment and protect the planet from further environmental degradation.

The right to a healthy environment or the right to a sustainable and healthy environment is a human right advocated by human rights organizations and environmental organizations to protect the ecological systems that provide human health.

A clean and healthy environment is a very basis of human life, as are balanced ecosystems, biodiversity, and other elements of nature on which people depend, the judges reasoned. Just like food, work, housing and education, an all-round healthy environment should be considered a human right.

All people have a fundamental right to breathe clean air. Completely smoke-free indoor environments – with no exceptions – are the only proven way to protect people. 100% smoke-free environments require the elimination of all smoking and tobacco smoke indoors.

It is a duty of every citizen to protect and preserve the environment under Article 51-A(g) which says that “It shall be the duty of every citizen of India to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to have compassion for living creatures.”

Do laws really promote a cleaner environment? The laws definitely help to promote a healthier environment and to help the people who are affected by any disasters. One court case involves the people affected by river pollution to sue the company who is responsible.

Enjoyment of life and its attainment including their right to life with human dignity encompasses within its ambit, the protection and preservation of the environment, ecological balance which is free from pollution of air and water, sanitation without which life cannot be enjoyed.

Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution

(g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures; Article 51A (g) places a duty on the citizens of India to protect and improve the natural environment and have compassion for all living creatures.

In order to support conservation of environment, Constitution was amended by 42nd Amendment Act, 1976. By virtue of the amendment, Articles 48A and Article 51A(g) were inserted in the Constitution. Article 48A, interalia, provides that the State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment.

Environment Protection Act, 1986.

Congress’s authority to enact laws regulating the environment instead derives primarily from the Commerce Clause, found in Article I § 8 of the U.S. Constitution. The Commerce Clause reserves to the federal government the right to regulate interstate commerce – or commerce between states.

Article 48 -A of the constitution says that “the state shall endeavor to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country”.

The main objective of these laws was to protect the environment against public and private harms. The goal of the EPA is to monitor and analyze the environment, conduct research, and work closely with state and local governments to create pollution control policies.

The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 authorizes the central government to protect and improve environmental quality, control and reduce pollution from all sources, and prohibit or restrict the setting and /or operation of any industrial facility on environmental grounds.

At the time when the Constitution was enacted, there was no specific provision, act or article that deals with the protection of environment law. Only in the preamble of the Constitution, it is mentioned that India is a Socialist Country.

The Constitution of India, in terms of Article 48A, mandates that the State is under a Constitutional obligation to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forest and wild life in the country.

The preamble to our constitution provides for a socialist society which promotes environmental protection. The fundamental duties again clearly impose duty on all citizens to protect environment. The Directive principles further are directed towards the ideals of building a welfare state.

The state administration shall make necessary arrangements to re-organize agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines. The state shall endeavour to prohibit illegal slaughtering and smuggling of cattle, calves and other milch and draught cattle.

On 26 May 2017, the Ministry of Environment of the Government of India led by Bharatiya Janata Party imposed a ban on the sale and purchase of cattle for slaughter at animal markets across India, under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals statutes, although Supreme Court of India suspended the ban on sale of cattle in its …

Instead, under the heading “Organisation of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry”, Article 48 says the state shall “organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and shall, in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter, of cows and calves and …

Article 48 of the constitution of the Weimar Republic of Germany (1919–1933) allowed the President, under certain circumstances, to take emergency measures without the prior consent of the Reichstag. This power was understood to include the promulgation of “emergency decrees (Notverordnungen)”.

Answer. Article 48 of the constitution of the Weimar Republic of Germany allowed the President, under certain circumstances, to take emergency measures without the prior consent of the Reichstag. This power was understood to include the promulgation of “emergency decrees”.

Answer. Answer: The article 48 of the Weimar republic was deemed to be dangerous because it allowed the president to suspend the civil rights of the citizens during emergencies without prior inquiries.

Its Article 48 gave the president the power, “if public security and order” were “seriously disturbed or endangered within the German Reich,” to use the armed forces to restore them or suspend “for a while in whole or in part fundamental rights” guaranteed by the Constitution such as freedom of assembly and speech.