The Bayeux tapestry is a French depiction of the events leading up to the battle, and the battle itself. It clearly shows that William was the rightful king because it was a biased source (remember that William was French and the tapestry is French).

Why was the conquest of England documented in a tapestry? Tapestries were known to be both durable and portable. Record the losses caused by the Civil War.

The Bayeux Tapestry is a masterpiece of 11th century Romanesque art, which was probably commissioned by Bishop Odo, William the Conqueror’s half-brother, to embellish his newly-built cathedral in Bayeux in 1077. The Tapestry tells the story of the events surrounding the conquest of England by the Duke of Normandy.

What can we learn from looking at the Bayeux Tapestry? It tells the story of the Norman invasion of England in 1066 through panels which depict scenes of battle and of daily life. Therefore, from looking at the pictures on the tapestry, we can out much about life during the time of the invasion.

The Bayeux Tapestry was probably made in Canterbury around 1070. Because the tapestry was made within a generation of the Norman defeat of the Anglo-Saxons, it is considered to be a somewhat accurate representation of events.

The Bayeux Tapestry is a primary source, not a secondary source. It was created in the 11th century and portrays the Battle of Hastings which occurred…

The Bayeux Tapestry can be considered a primary source in the sense that it depicts Norman culture at the time of its creation, early in the Norman era of England’s history. Because the tapestry was likely not even begun until the 1070s, it is a secondary source in this sense.

A textbook can either be a secondary or tertiary source and, in seldom cases, a primary source. In most cases, the author of a textbook interprets prescribed theories of a topic and would, therefore, be a secondary source. A textbook can be a tertiary source when it simply indexes information about a particular topic.

A primary source is any original source – an image, text, newspaper article, political cartoon, map, deed, letter, diary, or artifact; and the list goes on – that comments on, testifies, or bears witness to the time period of its own production. In this respect, primary sources are the raw material of history.

Primary and secondary source examples

Calisphere’s primary sources include photographs, documents, newspapers, political cartoons, works of art, diaries, transcribed oral histories, advertising, and other cultural artifacts.

For example, a memoir would be considered a primary source in research concerning its author or about their friends characterized within it, but the same memoir would be a secondary source if it were used to examine the culture in which its author lived.

You should always try to read and cite the original work (the primary source). If it is not possible to do this, you have to cite the original as contained in the secondary source. Your in-text citation should include both authors: the author(s) of the original source and the author(s) of the secondary source.

For example, in Biblical studies some might call the Bible a primary source. But for some scholars, translators, our English Bible is a secondary source because the primary is the Bible in the original languages (Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic).

Primary sources are the original documents of an event or discovery such as results of research, experiments or surveys, interviews, letters, diaries, legal documents, and scientific journal articles.

Some examples of primary source formats include: archives and manuscript material. photographs, audio recordings, video recordings, films. journals, letters and diaries.

A Secondary Source is almost always a published document. Often diaries, letters, public laws and the like are published. They are still Primary Sources.

Scholarly Sources A scholarly source can be an article or book that was written by an expert in the academic field. You may decide to use sources that are not scholarly articles, such as interviews or newspaper articles. These sources should also be written by an expert in the field and published by a reputable source.

The term scholarly typically means that the source has been “peer-reviewed,” which is a lengthy editing and review process performed by scholars in the field to check for quality and validity. To determine if your source has been peer-reviewed, you can investigate the journal in which the article was published.

Books, conference publications, and academic journal articles, regardless of whether they are print-based or electronic, are common types of scholarly materials, which share the following characteristics: The authors are scholars or researchers with known affiliations and educational/research credentials./span>

The article is most likely scholarly if:

1. The source is longer than 10 pages.
2. Has a works cited or bibliography.
3. It does not attempt to persuade or bias the reader.
4. It attempts to persuade or bias the reader, but treats the topic objectively, the information is well-supported, and it includes a works cited or bibliography.

Only credible, scholarly material is included in Google Scholar, according to the inclusion criteria: “content such as news or magazine articles, book reviews, and editorials is not appropriate for Google Scholar.” Technical reports, conference presentations, and journal articles are included, as are links to Google …/span>

Newspapers are not as easy to classify as other sources. Newspapers are not scholarly sources, but some would not properly be termed popular, either. But some newspapers, such as The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, have developed a national or even worldwide reputation for thoroughness.

If the article is from a printed journal, look at the publication information in the front of the journal. If the article is from an electronic journal, go to the journal home page and look for a link to ‘About this journal’ or ‘Notes for Authors’. Here it should tell you if the articles are peer-reviewed./span>